Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Miravalle
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 18, 2000No. SC93101PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
761 So.2d 1049 (2000)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Candice L. MIRAVALLE, etc., et al., Respondents.
No. SC93101.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 18, 2000.
Rehearing Denied July 10, 2000.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Mary Ellen Bateman, Unlicensed Practice of Law Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida; James E. McDonald, Chair, Standing Committee on Unlicensed Practice of Law, Miami, Florida; and Barry W. Rigby, Branch UPL Counsel, Orlando, Florida, for Complainant.
Candice L. Miravalle, Melbourne, Florida, Respondent, pro se.
2Per curiam
Candice L. Miravalle, individually, and Express…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- The Florida Bar v. SchramekSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- The Florida Bar v. FurmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- The Florida Bar v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- The Florida Bar v. CatarcioSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. RapoportSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- The Florida Bar v. CosnowSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- The Florida Bar v. NeimanSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- The Florida Bar v. HughesSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Stenzel v. Equifax Information Services LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.