Legal Opinion

State v. Norman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1969No. 68-7587; 68-7588; 43PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHusKiNS, J.

A plea of nolo contendere is a formal declaration on defendant’s part that he will not contend with the State in respect to the charge and is tantamount to a plea of guilty for purposes of the particular criminal action in which it is tendered and accepted. The presiding judge acquires full power to pronounce judgment against the defendant for the crime charged in the indictment. State v. Jamieson, 232 N.C. 731, 62 S.E. 2d 52; State v. Cooper, 238 N.C. 241, 77 S.E. 2d 695; State v. McIntyre, 238 N.C. 305, 77 S.E. 2d 698; State v. Shepherd, 230 N.C. 605, 55 S.E. 2d 79; State v. Stansbury, 230…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. State v. . CambySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. StansburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. North Carolina State Bar v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. ThurgoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API