Botelho v. Curtis
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
This is an action to recover damages, including consequential damages, for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. The writ designates the plaintiff as “a minor acting through his father and next friend, Edward C. Botelho.” The father is not individually a party to the action.
The complaint as amended alleges that the plaintiff Edward J. Botelho was a passenger in a motor vehicle owned by the plaintiff’s father, Edward C. Botelho, and operated by the defendant Max R. Curtis within the scope of his employment as agent, servant and employer of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shiels v. AudetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Williams v. CleavelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Wilmot v. McPaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Murphy v. Derby Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilson v. ZembaConnecticut Superior Court · 2004
- Green v. Mancusi, No. Cv92 0128849 S (Jan. 18, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Aguilar v. Midstate Developers, No. Cv 960131917 (Oct. 10, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Barger v. CoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Barger v. CoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.