Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barger v. Cox

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1985No. 14422Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

For the reasons that I believe questions of fact existed for a jury’s determination, I respectfully dissent.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Summary judgment is properly awarded “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” SDCL 15-6-56(c) (emphasis supplied). Although summary judgment is appropriate in all types of litigation, it is not generally suitable in negligence actions. Wilson v. Great Northern…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Stoltz v. StonecypherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Tisko v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Wolff v. Du PuisOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Shiels v. AudetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API