United States v. Coombs
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Sernor Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the summary assignments of error,1 and the Government’s reply thereto, and we have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.
In Ms first assignment of error, the appellant fails to indicate what he considers inadequate in the staff judge advocate’s post-trial recommendation, which included information that the appellant had served in the U.S. Marine Corps approximately 4 years before his current enlistment began…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. MitchellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. OrtizU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. PainterU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. ThatchU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.