Lynch v. Maw
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether a stock broker who purchased stocks on the New York Stock Exchange on behalf of an “outside” broker, held them in pledge to support the latter’s account and resold them upon his order is, upon the outside broker’s defalcation, responsible to the customer who has paid the outside broker in full for the stock.
Upon suit by Cecil L. Lynch (the customer) against J. A. Hogle & Company (the exchange seat broker), the trial court dismissed plaintiff’s action at the conclusion of his evidence on the ground that Hogle was neither…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Korns v. Thomson & McKinnonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
- Cisler v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bennett v. Logan & BryanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brumm v. McDonald & Co. Securities, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lynch v. MawUtah Supreme Court · 1955