Legal Opinion
Lynch v. Maw
Utah Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1955No. 8022Published
1Opinion of the Court
3 Utah 2d 271 (1955)
282 P.2d 841
CECIL L. LYNCH, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE C. MAW, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD C. BADGER, DECEASED, AND J.A. HOGLE, JAMES E. HOGLE AND NUMEROUS OTHER PERSONS, A PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A J.A. HOGLE & CO., DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.
No. 8022.
Supreme Court of Utah.
April 25, 1955.
Rawlings, Wallace, Roberts & Black, Dwight L. King, Salt Lake City, for appellant.
Marr, Wilkins & Cannon, Richard H. Nebeker, Salt Lake City, for respondents.
CROCKETT, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether a stock broker who purchased stocks on the New York…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Korns v. Thomson & McKinnonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
- Cisler v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bennett v. Logan & BryanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.