Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Logan & Bryan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 6, 1927No. Docket No. 3178PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

Logan & Bryan are stock brokers holding membership in the New York Stock Exchange and having offices in New York City and elsewhere. For some time prior to October, 1919, George G. Prentice conducted business as a stock broker in San Diego under the name of Prentice & Company. As such broker he purchased from Logan & Bryan for his customers certain securities, which were thereafter held by Logan & Bryan as security for the general indebtedness of Prentice & Company. At the time mentioned “the business of Prentice & Company was purchased by Mason & Owen, who thereafter, until the time of their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Miller v. Germain Seed & Plant Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Blankenhorn-Hunter-Dulin Co. v. ThayerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Goldsmith v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Woltz v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newman v. First California Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. H. Glen Leason v. John D. RosartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Lynch v. MawUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Lynch v. MawUtah Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API