Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Mason

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1931No. 27803PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action for conversion of certain bonds. Defendants denied conversion. A trial to the court resulted in a judgment for defendants. Plaintiff has appealed.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendants signed, as sureties, a county depository bond for the Bank of Ashton, running to Sherman county. At the time this bond was executed it was agreed that the bank would indemnify the *485sureties against loss by the deposit of bonds or other assets of the bank. Pursuant to this agreement, the bonds, alleged to have been converted, were pledged to protect defendants from loss by reason of their…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First American Bank & Trust Co. v. Town of Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. McFerson v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Richards v. Osceola BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Williams v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Village of BassfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shornick, Rec. v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Sneeden v. City of Marion, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  3. Bliss v. Pathfinder Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Strain v. Potter CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PottorffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API