Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Pathfinder Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1932No. 28019PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action to cancel a real estate mortgage and to quiet in plaintiff title to the mortgaged premises. The trial court entered a decree for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed.

The state bank, of which plaintiff is now receiver, executed and delivered to defendant a mortgage for $5,000 on real estate, an asset of the bank, to secure repayment of deposits of funds that defendant thereafter might make in the bank. Later the bank became insolvent and a re-, ceiver was appointed, at which time defendant had $4,714.23 deposited in the bank. The receiver seeks to have the mortgage canceled on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Western National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Thaanum v. Bynum Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Board of Directors v. CollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lincoln & Dawson County Irrigation District v. McNealNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Bank of Commerce v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. State v. Cheyenne CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Sneeden v. City of Marion, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  5. Evans v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICT OF OMAHANebraska Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API