Legal Opinion

McAnulty v. City of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1925No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Pursuant to an ordinance of the City of Pittsburgh, there was submitted to its electors, inter alia, the question of whether its indebtedness should be increased in the sum of $801,000, “For the city’s share, of the cost, damages and expense (including engineering expenses) of opening......and improving......grading and regrading, curbing and recurbing, relaying sidewalks and laying and relaying sewers and drains, constructing and reconstructing retaining walls and street foundations and surfaces (including any and all such improvements as may be incidentally…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Appeal of the City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  2. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Wade v. Oakmont BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Schuldice v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Pike County v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Georges Township v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Charleroi Lumber Co. v. Bentleyville Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Pittsburgh Paving Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Ward v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Miller & Sons' Co. v. Mt. Lebanon TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API