Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Paving Co. v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1938No. Appeal, 184PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On June 11, 1929, pursuant to proceedings in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Allegheny County, the electorate of the Borough of Overbrook, which was contiguous to the City of Pittsburgh, voted in favor of annexation to the city. The effective date of annexation was fixed by the court as January 6, 1930. During these six intervening months between the election and the annexation, the borough council entered into contracts for twenty-four street improvement projects. Sixteen of these contracts were awarded to the legal plaintiff, the Pittsburgh Paving Company. As construction under the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Luzerne Township v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Keller v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Kelley v. Baldwin, Auditor GeneralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Jackson v. Conneautville Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Heilig Bros. Co., Inc. v. KohlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Ervin v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. School District v. Framlau Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Pittsburgh Baseball, Inc. v. Stadium AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Edmondson v. ZetuskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API