Legal Opinion

Schuldice v. City of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1915No. Appeals, Nos. 133 and 134PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeals, Nos. 133 and 134, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, and the City of Pittsburgh and Joseph Gf. Armstrong, defendants, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 1348, on bill in equity for an injunction, in case of Charles A. Schuldice, a Taxpayer of the City of Pittsburgh, v. The City of Pittsburgh, a Municipal Corporation of Pennsylvania, and Joseph G. Armstrong, Mayor, Appellants, and E. S. Morris, City Controller of said city.

Read the full summary

Appeals, Nos. 133 and 134, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, and the City of Pittsburgh and Joseph Gf. Armstrong, defendants, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 1348, on bill in equity for an injunction, in case of Charles A. Schuldice, a Taxpayer of the City of Pittsburgh, v. The City of Pittsburgh, a Municipal Corporation of Pennsylvania, and Joseph G. Armstrong, Mayor, Appellants, and E. S. Morris, City Controller of said city. Bill in equity to enjoin a municipality from issuing bonds. Exceptions to the report of J. B. Eichenauer, referee, Before Swearingen, J. The opinion…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

This was a bill in equity filed by plaintiff, as a taxpayer and resident of Pittsburgh, against the City of Pittsburgh, Joseph G. Armstrong, its mayor, and E. S. Morrow, city controller, to restrain the issue of four series of bonds, which were authorized without submitting the matter to a vote of the people. The ordinances, in question, provided for the issue of bonds, as follows:

1. Bonds to the amount of $2,760,000, designated “Funding Bonds 1911,” authorized' by Ordinance No. 389, approved November 11, 1911, which bonds were to be issued to fund a then existing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keller v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Brooke v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Commonwealth v. Monongahela Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Monongahela Bridge Co. v. Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Point Bridge Co. v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. City of Stamford v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. Emerson v. City of Mound CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Town of Camden v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Pittsburgh Paving Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API