Legal Opinion
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 5, 2010No. 3:09-cr-00001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
In this patent infringement lawsuit, plaintiff Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Company, Ltd. contends that certain liquid crystal display products made by defendants Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., S-LCD Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC infringe four of plaintiffs patents relating to thin-film transistors: United States Patent Nos. 6,900,463 (the '463 patent), 7,215,402 (the '402 patent), 7,394,516 (the '516 patent) and 7,413,937 (the '937 patent). Defendants have asserted…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brooks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- ESCO Corp. v. Cashman Equipment Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Exergen Corp. v. Brooklands Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Exergen Corporation v. Brooklands Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Exergen Corporation v. Brooklands Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- National Products Inc. v. Gamber-Johnson LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022