Legal Opinion

Exergen Corporation v. Brooklands Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 20, 2018No. 1:12-cv-12243Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EXERGEN CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) 12-12243-DPW ) BROOKLANDS INC., ) ) Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. ) AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER February 20, 2018 The plaintiff Exergen’s initiative in bringing this patent infringement litigation has proven counterproductive. The case occasioned my decision to hold the asserted claims 51 and 54 of the ‘938 patent invalid. Exergen v. Brooklands, Inc.,

125 F. Supp. 3d 307

(D. Mass. 2015). Exergen, nevertheless, undertook to continue the litigation by…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API