Legal Opinion

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. T & N PLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 18, 1995No. 87 Civ. 4436 (JGK)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KOELTL, District Judge:

The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) brought this action seeking to recover the costs of abatement and removal of Sprayed Limpet Asbestos (“SLA”) fireproofing manufactured by the defendant T & N pie (“T & N”) and installed at One Chase Manhattan Plaza (“One CMP”), a building owned by Chase. Chase asserts causes of action for breach of express and implied warranty, negligence, strict liability, fraud, restitution, indemnity, and nuisance, and claims compensatory damages in excess of $100 million, punitive damages of $100 million, costs and attorney’s…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. DumasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Lara v. Delta International Machinery Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  4. Domino Media, Inc. v. KranisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. National Convention Services, L.L.C. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API