Legal Opinion
Doe v. Meachum
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 12, 1989No. Civ. No. H-88-562(PCD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DORSEY, District Judge.
Absent objection, the magistrate’s ruling is accepted and adopted.
SO ORDERED.
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
JOAN GLAZER MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate.
On August 15, 1988, plaintiffs commenced this action with respect to the various policies of the Connecticut Department of Corrections regarding inmates who are infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (“HIV”)1;that same day, Judge Cabranes granted plaintiffs’ motion for permission to prosecute suit in fictitious names. By agreement of counsel, on January 20, 1989, the court certified a class…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lora v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Wainwright v. Kraftco Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
- Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Doe v. CoughlinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1988
- United States v. Trucking Employers, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Van HunnikDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Doe v. MarshDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Ginest v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF CARBON COUNTYDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2004
- Disability Rights Connecticut, Inc. v. Connecticut Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Klick v. Cenikor FoundationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022