Legal Opinion

Klick v. Cenikor Foundation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 6, 2022No. 4:19-cv-01583Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 06, 2022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION TIMOTHY KLICK, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-01583 § CENIKOR FOUNDATION, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM & OPINION The Court held a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Motion for Certification and Notice to Potential Opt-in Plaintiffs (Doc. 153) on March 25, 2022. The Court took the motion under advisement. It now GRANTS the motion for the reasons set forth below. I. BACKGROUND Cenikor holds itself out as a drug rehabilitation program employing the Therapeutic…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
  3. Walling v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Swales v. KLLM Transport ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  5. William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Mr. W Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API