Legal Opinion
Mair v. Trollhaugen Ski Resort
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 3, 2005No. 2004AP1252PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. Julie Mair appeals a summary judgment dismissing her safe place claim against Trollhaugen Ski Resort. The trial court concluded that injuries Mair sustained after falling in a bathroom arose from a structural defect, so her claim was barred by the ten-year builder's statute of repose, Wis. Stat. § 893.89. Mair claims the statute of repose does not apply to claims brought under the safe place statute, Wis. Stat. § 101.11. We affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. On January 23, 2001, Mair was skiing at Trollhaugen. At some point, she went into the bathroom, where she stepped on a recessed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Lambrecht v. Estate of KaczmarczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WilliquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Germanotta v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Ruppa v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mair v. Trollhaugen Ski ResortWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Rosario v. Acuity & Oliver Adjustment Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- Shain v. Racine Raiders Football Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Estate of Carol Lorbiecki v. Pabst Brewing CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2026
- Crisanto v. Heritage Relocation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014