Legal Opinion
Rosario v. Acuity & Oliver Adjustment Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 10, 2007No. 2006AP2421PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEDEMEYER, PJ.
¶ 1. Patricia Rosario appeals from a summary judgment order dismissing her action against Oliver Adjustment Company (Oliver) and its insurer, Acuity, for negligence and safe place violations. Because Rosario's claim for injuries due to a fall was based upon a structural defect, subject to the barring provision of the statute of repose, and not caused by an unsafe condition associated with a structure, we affirm.
I. Background
¶ 2. On June 16, 2004, Rosario visited an office building located at 4763 South Packard Avenue in Cudahy, Wisconsin. It was occupied and owned by Oliver, a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- May v. Skelley Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Pettric v. Gridley Dairy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gaethke v. PozderCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
- Correa v. Woodman's Food Mkt.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
- Soletski v. Krueger Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
- Crisanto v. Heritage Relocation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- Fagan, Robert v. Superior Refinery Co., LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.