Legal Opinion

832 CORP. INC. v. Gloucester Tp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 12, 2005No. Civ. 04-1140(JEI)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRENAS, Senior District Judge:

Plaintiffs 832 Corporation, Inc., 225 Corporation, Inc., and the John Adams Club, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”), brought the instant action challenging the constitutionality of Gloucester Township (“Township”) Ordinance 0-99-04 (“Ordinance”), which regulates adult businesses. Presently before the Court are the cross-motions of Plaintiffs and the Township for summary judgment.

I

A. Gloucester Township Ordinance 0-99-04

The Township adopted the Ordinance on February 22, 1999. The Ordinance created a comprehensive licensing scheme to regulate “adult-use establishments”…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. GravesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  2. People v. GravesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. Beverly Hills Suites LLC v. Town of Windsor LocksDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  4. Nguon v. WolfDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  5. Vivid Entertainment, LLC v. FieldingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API