Legal Opinion
Vivid Entertainment, LLC v. Fielding
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 16, 2013No. Case No. CV 13-00190 DDP (AGRx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART INTERVEN-ERS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; AND VACATING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
[Docket Nos. 49, 55, 64]
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
I. Background
Plaintiffs Vivid Entertainment, LLC (“Vivid”) and Califa Productions, Inc., produce adult films. (Compl. ¶¶ 8-9, Docket No. 1.) Plaintiffs Jane Doe, known professionally as Kayden Kross (“Ms. Kross”), and John Doe, known professionally as Logan Pierce (“Mr. Pierce”), are performers who appear in adult…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duncan v. BecerraDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019