Legal Opinion

(PC) Kauth v. Tule River Tribal Police Department

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 7, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01731Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH VINCENT KAUTH, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01731-KES-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUESTS FOR FUNDING 13 v. (Doc. 12) 14 TULE RIVER TRIBAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Joseph Vincent Kauth is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was filed April 25, 2024, and is pending screening 22 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 23 On May 2, 2024,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Norman E. Tedder v. Edward Odel, Cpl., James Scott McAlisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Bobby Marion Dixon v. Eddie YlstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Pedraza v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Gorton v. ToddDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API