Norman E. Tedder v. Edward Odel, Cpl., James Scott McAlister
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Plain tiff-appellant Norman E. Tedder (Tedder) appeals pro se from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Edward Odel (Odel) and James S. McAlister (McAlister). Tedder brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985(3) alleging that McAlister, an assistant attorney general for the state of Oregon, told Odel, an officer at the Oregon State Penitentiary, not to honor a subpoena to testify in a civil rights case Tedder had filed against another prison guard. The district court held that because the subpoena was invalid, McAlister’s advice and Odel’s failure to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Boring v. KozakiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- William McNeil v. Mary A. LowneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by214 opinions
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Robertson v. Dennis (In Re Dennis)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Bobby Marion Dixon v. Eddie YlstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Badman v. StarkDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.