Legal Opinion
Pedraza v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 27, 1995No. 95-40351PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
Leopold Lee Pedraza (“Pedraza”) appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Richard L. Jones, Kenneth Rosenquest, and Smejkal (collectively, “defendants”) on the ground that Pedraza’s claims were time-barred. Pedraza argues that an expert witness should have been appointed to help him prepare his case and that the district court erred in striking his affidavits. Finding no error in the district court’s judgment, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Pedraza filed a pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim in forma pauperis, alleging that the defendants, officials and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Genus D. Ulmer v. George Chancellor, Sheriff, and Jones County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Financial Acquisition Partners LP v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Carolyn S. Watts v. The Kroger Company Arthur Bullington, the Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Kathleen Kremser JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Alex Pearson v. Anthony RamosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.