Cannon v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Morris, Commissioner—
Affirming.
Appellant instituted his action against appellee, which he alleges is an unincorporated association with, an extensive membership. He named the general chairman, the local chairman, and some representative members of the Brotherhood as parties defendant. Summons, was served on two of those alleged to be representative members, and on one described in the petition as being a chairman.
The appellee and each personal defendant served, as well as those not served, moved the court to- quash, the return on the summons, which motion the court,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gregg v. StarksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Aulich v. CraigmyleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. SwearingenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Winterberg v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elder v. New York Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Allen v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Samuelson v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Rocky Mountain Lodge No. 852Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- Langhurst v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1949