Legal Opinion

Langhurst v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided August 9, 1949No. 1226Published

1Opinion of the Court

Weiss, J.,

Plaintiffs in this action filed a bill in equity seeking to restrain defendants from putting into effect an agreement between the Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company and System Federation No. 103, A. F. L., boiler makers, sheet metal workers, machinists, blacksmiths and firemen, and oilers (parent union), concerning the con: solidation of the above forces in the locomotive department at McKees Rocks, Pa., into one seniority district and roster.

Both defendants filed preliminary objections to the bill, maintaining that the facts set forth in the bill are insufficient to warrant…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API