Legal Opinion

Allen v. Southern Pacific Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory decree. The plaintiffs are trainmen employed on the Portland division of the Southern Pacific Company and are members of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen. The defendants, except the Southern Pacific Company, which occupies a neutral position between these litigants, are' members of the Brotherhood and, with the exception of certain officers thereof, are employed as trainmen on the Shasta division of said company. These two divisions are under different railroad superintendents' and each constitutes a separate seniority district.

The plaintiffs allege in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Donovan v. TraversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Richards v. MorisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Pratt v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street & Electric Railway Employees of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Cannon v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Josephine County School District No. 7 v. Oregon School Activities Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Finley v. DuffyOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Fox v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Coos Bay Lumber Co. v. Local 7-116, International Woodworkers of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McClendon v. KeninOregon Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API