Legal Opinion

Idbeis v. Wichita Surgical Specialists, P.A.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 21, 2007No. 96,606PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This appeal raises an issue of first impression; When a party who receives a temporary injunction and posts an injunction bond does not ultimately prevail in the action, is the party hable under K.S.A. 60-905(b) for the attorney fees and expenses incurred by the opposing party, including fees incurred during a trial on the merits and during an appeal, even though the opposing party files a counterclaim and seeks a temporary and permanent injunction? Because damages payable by injunction bonds are generally limited to those actually and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Continental Oil Company v. The Frontier Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Steffes v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Padron v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Schmidt v. Trademark, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API