Idbeis v. Wichita Surgical Specialists, P.A.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
This appeal raises an issue of first impression; When a party who receives a temporary injunction and posts an injunction bond does not ultimately prevail in the action, is the party hable under K.S.A. 60-905(b) for the attorney fees and expenses incurred by the opposing party, including fees incurred during a trial on the merits and during an appeal, even though the opposing party files a counterclaim and seeks a temporary and permanent injunction? Because damages payable by injunction bonds are generally limited to those actually and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Continental Oil Company v. The Frontier Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Steffes v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Padron v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Schmidt v. Trademark, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.