Legal Opinion

Martin v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 13, 1992No. 78939PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION BY ORDER

The Court’s Order of April 6, 1992 Denying Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby WITHDRAWN, sua sponte, and the following order is substituted therefor:

Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss this appeal is DENIED. The handwritten minute overruling appellant’s motion to reconsider, initialed by the trial judge and filed of record on December 2,1991, did not commence the time in which to file an appeal.

Title 12, O.S.1991, § 32.3 provides:

“A. It is the duty of the court to write out, sign and record its orders, judgments and decrees within a reasonable time after their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Origet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. v. PuglianiArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Volpe v. SensatiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Stork v. StorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Bushert v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Hammonds v. Osteopathic Hospital Founders Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Marshall v. OK Rental & Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API