Legal Opinion

Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. v. Pugliani

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1985No. 17635-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Petitioners Stewart Title & Trust (Stewart) held approximately $175,000 in trust. The beneficiaries of record for this trust were Albino Pugliani, Lenora Pugliani, his wife, and Theron Miller. Respondents Burch & Cracchiolo and D’Antonio & D’Antonio (the lawyers) both claimed an interest in the trust. This claim stemmed from a prior contingent fee arrangement that the lawyers had with Pugliani and Miller (the clients).

The lawyers eventually sued both the clients and Stewart. The lawyers sought assignment of a portion of the trust res. The trial court granted summary judgment for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Markel v. Transamerica Title Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Harmon v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Markel v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Amtitle Trust Company v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Trieweiler Ex Rel. Varsity Investments, Inc. v. SearsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Murphy Farrell Development, LLLP v. SourantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Premier Financial Services. v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Martin v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Wilcox v. WaldmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API