Legal Opinion
Republic Industries, Inc. v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 19, 1982No. 82-1251PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
It is a “long settled rule of judicial administration that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted.” Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41, 50-51, 58 S.Ct. 459, 463-64, 82 L.Ed. 638 (1938). The question for decision in this appeal is whether, the district court erred in applying this rule when it refused to consider a challenge to the constitutionality of the Mul-tiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 because appellant had not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Barker & Williamson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Clair v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Dorothy Blitz v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Patlex Corporation v. Gerald J. MossinghoffCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.