State v. Fimbres

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Javier Fim-bres was convicted of three counts of forgery of a ei’edit card, one count of theft of items with a market value of more than $2,000, three counts of computer tampering, and one count of fraudulent scheme and artifice. He was sentenced to multiple concurrent prison terms, the longest of which was 4.5 years. On appeal, Fimbres argues the state presented insufficient evidence to support several of his convictions. He also contends his right to due process was violated because the trial court instructed the jury on an…