State v. Maldonado
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BALES, Justice.
¶ 1 We hold that the State’s failure to file an information before trial did not deprive the superior court of subject matter jurisdiction or constitute fundamental error.
I
¶ 2 Frank R. Maldonado was charged by direct complaint with possession of cocaine. After a preliminary hearing, the superior court found probable cause to hold him for trial. That day, Maldonado was arraigned and the court entered his not guilty plea. A minute entry for this hearing indicates that an information was filed, but the hearing transcript does not refer to an information. The State later…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Marvin Johnson, PC v. MyersArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- A.S. v. R.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Smith v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Ader v. Estate of FelgerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State v. SpreadburyMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Glover v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.