Legal Opinion

People in Interest of MC

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 30, 1989No. 87SC379PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRSHBAUM, Justice.

Petitioner, M.C., seeks certiorari review of a judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the trial court’s denial of his motion to vacate illegal sentence.1 750 P.2d 69. The Court of Appeals concluded that M.C.’s rights to equal protection of the law as guaranteed by article II, section 25, of the Colorado Constitution and the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution were not violated by the disposition ordered in this juvenile proceeding. We affirm, but for reasons differing from those articulated by the Court of Appeals.

I

In August 1985, a petition in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re the People ex rel. W.P.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  2. In Re Interest of AMHNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In the Interest of R.J.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. People v. Juvenile Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. People in Interest of ARMColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API