In re the People ex rel. W.P.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
T 1 We accepted jurisdiction over this original proceeding to determine whether an indigent alleged juvenile offender is entitled as of right to a second competency evaluation at state expense. The petition initially framed the issue more broadly as "[wlhether the trial court judge abused his discretion by refusing to order a second competency evaluation at state expense." - However, the public defender had justified-and the juvenile court denied-her request for a second competency evaluation at state expense on the basis that the Colorado Children's Code's silence on the issue meant it…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. IbarraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Simmonds v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- A.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- Shaw v. 17 West Mill St., LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- Francen v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.