Legal Opinion

In re the People ex rel. W.P.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 11, 2013No. Supreme Court Case No. 12SA263PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

T 1 We accepted jurisdiction over this original proceeding to determine whether an indigent alleged juvenile offender is entitled as of right to a second competency evaluation at state expense. The petition initially framed the issue more broadly as "[wlhether the trial court judge abused his discretion by refusing to order a second competency evaluation at state expense." - However, the public defender had justified-and the juvenile court denied-her request for a second competency evaluation at state expense on the basis that the Colorado Children's Code's silence on the issue meant it…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. People v. IbarraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Simmonds v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  2. A.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  3. Shaw v. 17 West Mill St., LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  4. Francen v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API