Legal Opinion

Barron v. Board of Dental Examiners

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1941No. Civ. 11465PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioner, a practicing dentist who had been suspended for a limited period by the defendant board' for unprofessional conduct, filed his petition in the superior court seeking a peremptory writ of mandate directed to said board. He appeals from a judgment which denied him such relief.

Petitioner was charged by accusation before said board with “unprofessional conduct” as defined in section 1680, subdivision 12 of the Business and Professions Code which covers “The advertising of professional superiority or the performance of professional services in a superior manner.” It was alleged therein…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sobey v. MolonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Donovan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Kalman v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Medical Examiners v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Wayne v. Bureau of Private Investigators & AdjustersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Bandeen v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  4. Board of Dental Examiners v. JamesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Board of Medical Examiners v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API