Filmore LLLP v. Unit Owners Ass'n of Centre Pointe Condominium
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
González, J.
¶1 — We are asked whether amending a particular condominium declaration to provide that only a certain percentage of condominium units may be leased is an amendment that changes “the uses to which any unit is restricted,” which requires special supermajority approval under RCW 64.34.264(4) and the declaration. We find that the amendment does change “the uses to which any unit is restricted” under this particular declaration because the declaration provides that leasing is a use, and, therefore, special supermajority approval was required for the amendment. Because the amendment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bilanko v. Barclay Court Owners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Kiona Park Estates, V. Avera Lee DehlsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Bilanko v. Barclay Court Owners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Bilanko v. Barclay Court Owners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Bowa Estates Limited v. Association of Apartment Owners of Wailea Point VillageDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2025