Legal Opinion

Bilanko v. Barclay Court Owners Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2016No. 91247-5PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶ 1 The Barclay Court Owners Association amended its condominium declaration to restrict the number of units that could be leased at one time. After this amendment was passed and recorded, Carolyn Bilanko purchased a condo at Barclay Court. Four years later, Bilanko challenged the amendment as improperly passed. We must decide whether Bilanko’s challenge is timely under the Washington Condominium Act (WCA), chapter 64.34 RCW. We hold that it is not timely and reverse.

Background

¶2 Barclay Court is a condominium owners’ association for a 28-unit residential condominium development…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Daniel Campeau v. Yakima HMA LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  2. Household Finance Corp. v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Shamim Mohandessi And Joseph Grace, Apps/cross-res. v. Urban Venture, Llc, Res/cross-apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Campeau v. Yakima HMA, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Charles A. Anton v. Philippe L. HouzeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API