Legal Opinion

Hartfield v. Alderete

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 11, 1914No. Civ. No. 1652PublishedCited by 3 opinions

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Wellborn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Plaintiff, who is respondent, moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that notice thereof and request for a transcript was not filed within ten days after notice to the defendant of the entry of judgment. The appeal was taken under the alternative method. No notice of the entry of judgment was served upon defendant. After the entry of judgment defendant, as shown by the certificate of the clerk, prior to taking any steps to appeal therefrom, filed a bond the purpose of which was to stay execution of the judgment; and respondent contends that actual notice of the entry of judgment must be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Mallory v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Gardner v. StareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Title Ins. & Tr. Co. v. California Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reyes Mejías v. ReyesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  2. Hartfield v. AldereteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Reyes Mejías v. Delia ReyesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API