Hartfield v. Alderete
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
A motion to dismiss the appeal in this case was denied by order of this court entered November 11, 1914, 25 Cal. App. 732, [145 Pac. 146]. Respondent now further insists that the appeal should have been dismissed and that this court has no jurisdiction other than to enter a dismissal.
The order of November 11, 1914, being now final, is the law of the case on the points involved in the motion. The motion to dismiss was based upon the ground that notice of appeal and request for a transcript was not filed within ten days after notice to the defendant of the entry of the judgment. We think that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Hartfield v. AldereteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Pigeon Point Ranch, Inc. v. PerotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Nichols v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949