Legal Opinion

Artac v. Union Collieries Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1942No. Appeal, 100PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.,

The previous appeal in this case was disposed of in an opinion reported in 140 Pa. Superior Ct. 499, 13 A. (2d) 909. An examination of it compels us to conclude it is not now open to defendant-appellant to challenge the finding of mistake of fact and improper conduct, the basis upon which the board set aside the final receipt. That issue is res adjudicata.

In its original opinion of July 14, 1938, the board concluded that: “It appearing to the Board that the claimant, Frank Artac, signed the final receipt under a mistake of fact and because of improper conduct on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seneca v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Carson v. Real Estate-Land T. & T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Weinstock v. United Cigar Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Keasbey's Trust EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Mancini v. Pennsylvania Rubber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MacIupa v. UNION SWITCH & SIGNALCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Holtz v. McGraw & BindleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Kelemon v. ReiberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Hite v. Rockhill Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Johnston v. Butler Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API