Holtz v. McGraw & Bindley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
This is an appeal by the claimant in a workmen’s compensation case concerning the form of an order of the board suspending payments of compensation, which was affirmed by the court below. It is contended only that the order is too broad, and it is admitted that the defendant was entitled to have a suspension of payments.
Claimant and defendant entered into an open agreement for total disability, and compensation was paid thereunder for some months. Defendant then petitioned to terminate, and amended to ask that the compensation be suspended.
The claimant ivas employed as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weinstock v. United Cigar Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Scipani v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Breisch v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chubb v. Allegheny Country ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Artac v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- DeBattiste v. Anthony Laudadio & SonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Ede v. Ruhe Motor Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Crain v. Small Tube Products, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- McGahen v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Benedict v. FOXSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.