Legal Opinion

Magesiny v. T. M. Smithian Trucking Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1932No. Appeal 239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The only dispute in this case is whether the court was correct in concluding as a matter of law that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

Under plaintiff’s testimony, on the morning of December 31, 1931, between 10 and 11 o’clock, his one-half ton Chevrolet truck was parked on the east side of 4th Street near the curb, facing south, and about 24 feet north of the north curb line of Queen Street, Philadelphia. He started his car, and was proceeding at about five miles an hour in a southerly direction near the curb when defendant’s truck, approaching from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cronmuller v. Evening TelegraphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Tomey v. West Penn Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kissinger v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Robinson Et Ux. v. OndackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Hoff v. TavaniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Magasiny v. T. M. Smithian Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API