Legal Opinion

Leininger v. Ward-Beekman & Brooks, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1929No. 19627PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and peremptory writ of mandamus in favor of the defendant in error, who was the plaintiff below and who will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error, who were defendants below and who will be hereinafter referred to as defendants, directing and commanding them to pay the plaintiff for the construction of a hard-surfaced road located within Pottawatomie county and known as Federal Aid Project No. 211, section C.

The plaintiff, a contractor, entered into a contract with the State Highway Commission to construct a hard-surfaced…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Foot v. Town of WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Hannan v. Bd. of Educ. of City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Sweeney v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Glasco v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Dolezal v. BostickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wiseman v. BorenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Newblock v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. ShankelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  5. Green-Boots Const. Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API