Legal Opinion
Verosol USA, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 8, 1996No. Slip Op. 96-167. Court No. 92-10-00697PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge:
In this designated test case, plaintiff, Verosol USA, Inc. (“Verosol”), an importer of metallized fabric, has invoked the court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1994), challenging the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) classification of its metallized fabric as “woven fabric of synthetic filament yarn ... containing 85 percent or more by weight of non-textured polyester filaments — other.” The Court has jurisdiction and, for the following reasons, enters summary judgment for plaintiff.
Background
Plaintiff has imported metallized fabric from Holland for over…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Brother International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Sarne Handbags Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Degussa Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006