Legal Opinion

Corsicana Compress Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1923No. 988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Quinn, J.

This controversy grew out of a contract for the sale of fuel oil. On June 18, 1919, appellant and appellee entered into a contract, which contained the following:

“Said seller-hereby agrees to sell and deliver to said buyer, said buyer agrees to purchase and receive from the seller, between June 17th, 1919, and June 17th, 1920, the fuel oil necessary to supply fuel and operate a compress during the term of this contract and not thereafter, not to exceed a maximum of 4,000 barrels, which maximum the seller agrees to furnish and the buyer to take if required for said purposes, and not less than…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulf Refining Co. v. Pegues Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Moore v. Paris Oil and Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Holland v. Pierce-Fordyce Oil Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Farmersville Independent Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Utah International, Inc. v. Colorado-Ute Electric Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API