Moore v. Paris Oil and Cotton Co.

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

— At a former day of this term we reversed and rendered the judgment of the court below, for appellant, our holding being, in effect, that the failure of appellant to furnish cattle to be fed was no excuse for the failure of the appellee to furnish the feed mentioned in the contract. After further consideration, we are now of the opinion that our former disposition of the case was erroneous.

As our views of the proper construction to be given the contract, which is the basis of the suit, have changed, it follows, that our conclusions of fact are erroneous, in that…