Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Farmersville Independent Gin Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1922No. 2592PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The only contention presented by the assignments which we think presents a debatable question is the one that the trial court erred when he construed the contract as binding appellant to furnish appellee for fuel purposes at least 15,000 gallons of oil between July 28, 1919, and July 28, 1920. Appellant's view is that the contract bound it to furnish only the oil necessary for fuel (not exceeding 20,000 gallons) in the operation of the gin between said dates, and did not bind it to furnish any oil between those dates for use by appellee as fuel after July 28, 1920.

Asserting that the contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrison v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Gulf Refining Co. v. Pegues Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Holland v. Pierce-Fordyce Oil Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Utah International, Inc. v. Colorado-Ute Electric Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1976
  2. Tryon & Carter v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Walters v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Corsicana Compress Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API