Picard v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Westminster
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
Is a claimed injury to a private easement right sufficient to confer standing to challenge a zoning determination made by a zoning board of appeals? In the circumstances of this case, we conclude that it is not. Maurice Picard, as the personal representative of his wife’s estate, commenced this action in the Superior Court after the zoning board of appeals of Westminster (zoning board) upheld the building commissioner’s determination that property abutting his, owned by the defendant, 3333, Inc., enjoyed grandfathered status under the Westminster zoning by law. After a bench trial, a judge in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Marashlian v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Barvenik v. Board of Aldermen of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Commercial Wharf East Condominium Ass'n v. Waterfront Parking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hickey v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Murrow v. EmeryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Aiello v. Planning Board of BraintreeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- Burdo v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of ChelmsfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Cuozzo v. KrumsiekMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.